Kane v. R.

[1984] 1 SCR 387 Court SCC Decision date 1984-05-14 Docket 16768 English

PartiesMartin Clayton Kane (Plaintiff) Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent

Counsel (4)

Andrew Kerekes, for the appellant.
Michael Dambrot, for the respondent.
Solicitors for the appellant: Kerekes, Collins, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Ontario

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—It will not be necessary to hear you Mr. Dambrot. The Court is in agreement with the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeal for Ontario and with the reasons therefor expressed by Mr. Justice Martin, speaking for the Court.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the appellant: Kerekes, Collins, Toronto.

Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.