← Cases

Reference re Gruenke

2000 SCC 32 [2000] 1 SCR 836 Court SCC Decision date 2000-06-15 Docket 27207 English

PartiesAdele Rosemary Breese (nee Gruenke) Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Judges McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis

Delivered by McLachlin C.J.

On appeal from Manitoba

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

McLachlin C.J.

The Chief Justice — We are all of the view that the appeal should be dismissed. We are of the view that the Court of Appeal correctly concluded that none of the information obtained by the Self Defence Review Committee would be admissible as fresh evidence. Under the terms of Reference, the admissibility of the information before the Committee as fresh evidence is a precondition to a new hearing under s. 690 (b) of the Criminal Code . The appellant concedes that if the report of Dr. Shane is not admissible, the appeal must fail. For the reasons given by the Court of Appeal, Dr. Shane’s new affidavit is not admissible. Therefore the appeal must fail.

Statutes and regulations cited