← Cases

R. v. D'Amico

2019 SCC 23 [2019] 2 SCR 394 Court SCC Decision date 2019-04-11 Heard 2019-04-11 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen Applicant·Giovanni D’Amico Respondent

Judges Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah

Delivered by The Court

On appeal from Quebec

Contents

Reasons for Order — The Court

The Court — The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the motion to quash is granted.
The motion to quash is granted.
A dissent within the meaning of s. 691(1) (a) of the Criminal Code , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 , means a disagreement which affects the result. In this case, Vauclair J.A.’s disagreement does not go to the result and is better characterized as a concurring opinion or an opinion concurring in the result.

Statutes and regulations cited