← Cases

R. v. Omar

2019 SCC 32 [2019] 2 SCR 576 Court SCC Decision date 2019-05-22 Heard 2019-05-22 Docket 38461 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen Appellant·Omar Muhammad Omar Respondent·Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario) Intervener

Counsel (4)
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
Solicitor for the appellant: Attorney General of Ontario, Toronto.
Solicitors for the respondent: Lockyer Campbell Posner, Toronto; Law Office of Patricia Brown, Windsor.
Solicitors for the intervener: Faisal Mirza Professional Corporation, Mississauga; Markson Law Professional Corporation, Toronto.

Judges Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah

Delivered by Brown J. (Wagner C.J. and Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe and Martin JJ. concurring)

On appeal from Ontario

Contents

Reasons for Judgment — Brown J. (Wagner C.J. and Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe and Martin JJ. concurring)

Brown J. — A majority of this Court would allow the appeal, substantially for the reasons of Brown J.A. at the Court of Appeal. The majority adds this. It may be that consideration should be given to the availability, under s. 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , of remedies other than exclusion of evidence when dealing with s. 24(2), but the majority would leave this question for another day.
Justices Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin dissent, substantially for the reasons of Sharpe J.A. at the Court of Appeal. The dissenters add this. It may be that consideration should be given to whether the police should caution persons that they stop and question that such persons need not remain or answer questions, but the dissenters would leave this for another day.
The appeal is allowed and the convictions are restored.

Statutes and regulations cited