← Cases

R. v. Cortes Rivera

2020 SCC 44 [2020] 3 SCR 906 Court SCC Decision date 2020-12-11 Heard 2020-12-11 Docket 39084 English

PartiesJoaquin Alfredo Cortes Rivera Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent·Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario Intervener

Counsel (2)
Solicitor for the respondent: Alberta Crown Prosecution Service, Appeals, Education & Prosecution Policy Branch, Edmonton.
Solicitors for the intervener: Addario Law Group, Toronto.

Judges Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas

Delivered by Unanimous — Abella J.

On appeal from Alberta

Contents

Unanimous Judgment Read By — Abella J.

The Court — We would dismiss the appeal. The parties did not dispute that the trial judge erred in dismissing the accused’s application under s. 276.1 of the Criminal Code , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 , to cross‑examine the complainant. In our view, this error did not lead to a miscarriage of justice and falls within the curative proviso under s. 686(1)(b) because the evidence was otherwise overwhelming and a conviction was inevitable.
We do not endorse Slatter J.A.’s application of s. 683(1). Neither party sought this remedy before the Court of Appeal, and in this Court, both parties as well as the intervener urged us to reject his approach.

Statutes and regulations cited