← Cases

R. v. Upston

[1988] 1 SCR 1083 Court SCC Decision date 1988-05-27 Docket 20382 English

PartiesJoseph Upston Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.

Decision 3–1–1 Majority (3) · Dickson C.J. (1) · La Forest J. (1)

On appeal from British Columbia

Subjects Constitutional law

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

Dickson C.J.

1. The Chief Justice‑‑It will not be necessary to hear from you Mr. Frankel. The judgment of the Court will be given by La Forest J.

La Forest J.

2. La Forest J.‑‑While there was a breach of s. 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in that the appellant was not informed of his right to retain and instruct counsel when he was initially detained, the evidence adduced was not obtained as a result of that breach but, as the trial judge found, was completely voluntary after he had been informed of his right to counsel. The evidence was thus not obtained in a manner that infringed or denied a Charter right within the meaning of s. 24 of the Charter and should consequently not be excluded. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: McCrea, Paul & Long, Vancouver.
Solicitor for the respondent: S. David Frankel, Vancouver.

Statutes and regulations cited