Hyperlawhypertext legal database Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co. 29 Cal. 2d 878

← Cases

Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.

29 Cal. 2d 878 Court Cal. Decision date 1946-12-19 Docket L. A. No. 18960 English

Contents

Majority

p. 878
176 P.2d 24]
[L. A. No. 18960.
In Bank.
Dec. 19, 1946.]
MARVIN L. ALLEN et al., Respondents, v. CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.
Baeigalupi, EIleus & Salinger, Philip Storer Thaeher and Charles DeY. Elkus for Appellant.
J. F. DuPaul, City Attorney, and Shelley J. Higgins for Respondent, City of San Diego.
Phil D. Swing and Charles C. Crouch for Respondents.

This is an appeal from an order made after judgment denying a motion for modification of the judgment. The appeal from the judgment has been this day decided ante, p. 466 [ 176 P.2d 8 ] (Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.). The opinion and decision on that appeal renders unnecessary a consideration of the questions here presented. This appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cases cited