Hyperlawhypertext legal database Kirsch et al. v. The Queen [1981] 1 SCR 437

← Cases

Kirsch et al. v. The Queen

[1981] 1 SCR 437 Court SCC Decision date 1980-10-27 English

PartiesIrving Kirsch and Herschel Rosenthal Applicants·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Counsel (5)
Michel Proulx, for the applicant Kirsch.
Gabriel Lapointe, Q.C., for the respondent.
Solicitors for the applicant Kirsch: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal.
Solicitor for the applicant Rosenthal: Jeffrey K. Boro, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent: Lapointe, Schachter & Champagne, Montreal.

Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Quebec

Subjects Courts

Contents

English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We are all of the opinion that the motion of appellants to extend the time for the hearing of the appeal must be dismissed and the appeal is deemed to be abandoned under s. 623(2) of the Criminal Code.
Application dismissed.
Solicitors for the applicant Kirsch: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal.
Solicitor for the applicant Rosenthal: Jeffrey K. Boro, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent: Lapointe, Schachter & Champagne, Montreal.

Footnotes

  1. [1] See [1981] 1 S.C.R. 438.

Statutes and regulations cited