Judgment of the Court — MARTLAND J.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by
MARTLAND J.—The appellant applied to the Federal Court of Appeal, pursuant to s. 28 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1970 (2nd Supp.), c. 10, to review and set aside a decision of an Appeal Board established by the Public Service Commission under the Public Service Employment Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. P-32, which had dismissed an appeal brought by the appellant pursuant to s. 21 of that Act.
In the spring of 1979, the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development held a closed competition for the position of Engineering and Works Manager (EG-ESS 9) (English). The competition poster provided that the competition was:
OPEN TO: Employees across Canada occupying positions in which the maximum rate of pay is not less than $22,600 per annum.
The applicant applied in the manner prescribed in the poster but was not allowed to participate in the competition on the ground that he occupied a position in which the maximum rate of pay was less than the prescribed minimum of $22,600.
The applicant contended that he was wrongfully excluded from the competition and that, as a consequence, no appointment should be made as a result of that competition. He rested his contention on two submissions, namely:
(1) that the provision limiting the right to participate in the competition to employees holding a position with a maximum rate of pay of at least $22,600 was invalid and contrary to the merit principle; and
(2) that, in any event, the Appeal Board had erred in finding that he occupied a position in which the maximum rate of pay was less than $22,600.
[Page 580]
The issue raised by the first submission was as to whether eligibility for a closed competition in the Public Service may be restricted by reference to a minimum salary level without reference to the occupational nature of positions in which candidates are employed.
The authority of the Public Service Commission to restrict eligibility for a closed competition is conferred by s. 13 of the Public Service Employment Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. P-32, as follows:
13. Before conducting a competition the Commission shall
(a) determine the area in which applicants must reside in order to be eligible for appointment; and
(b) in case of a closed competition, determine the part, if any, of the Public Service and the occupational nature and level of positions, if any, in which prospective candidates must be employed in order to be eligible for appointment.
The Federal Court of Appeal, by a majority of two to one, dismissed the appellant’s appeal. LeDain J. dissented. The reasons delivered in the Federal Court of Appeal are reported in [1980] 2 F.C. 110. With leave, the appellant appealed to this Court. The appellant’s argument before this Court was limited to the issue raised by his first submission.
In my opinion the reasons delivered, in dissent, by LeDain J. in respect of the first submission are sound in law and should be supported. He stated his conclusion as follows:
…The Commission has not directed its mind to the level of position, as it relates to occupational nature, at all. It has chosen the criterion of a minimum salary level without regard to the occupational nature of positions. In doing so it has in my opinion adopted a criterion for restriction of eligibility that is not authorized by the Act, and the Appeal Board erred in law in not allowing the appeal on this ground.
I would, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal and also the decision of the Public Service Commission Appeal Board. The appellant is entitled to
[Page 581]
his costs as against the Crown in this Court and in the Federal Court of Appeal.
Appeal allowed with costs.
Solicitors for the appellant: Soloway, Wright, Houston, Greenberg, O’Grady & Morin, Ottawa.
Solicitor for the respondents: R. Tassé, Ottawa.
Footnotes
- [1] [1980] 2 F.C. 110.
Cases cited
- 2 F.C. 110 2 F.C. 110
Statutes and regulations cited
-
Unresolved citations
- s. 28 of the Federal Court Act
- s. 21 of that Act