Majority
p. 685In the Matter of Rudolph M. Klenosky, Appellant, v New York City Police Department et al., Respondents. Decided March 31, 1981
p. 686
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Rudolph M. Klenosky, appellant pro se.
Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Joan E. Handler of counsel), for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d.793; see, also, Tdbankin v Codd, 40 NY2d 893 ).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Cases cited
- Tabankin v. Codd 40 NY2d 893 p. 686