Hyperlawhypertext legal database Respeto v. McNab 60 N.Y.2d 739

← Cases

Respeto v. McNab

60 N.Y.2d 739 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-10-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 739
In the Matter of Roberto Respeto, by His Attorney, Matthew J. Killion, Respondent, v Duncan McNab, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Appellants.
Argued September 15, 1983;
decided October 18, 1983
p. 741
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mario Merola, District Attorney (Steven R. Kartagener and Esther Furman of counsel), for appellants.
Philip L. Weinstein and William E. Hellerstein for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice E. Leo Milonas at the Appellate Division ( 90 AD2d 308 ).

p. 742
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited