Rice v. Penguin Putnam, Inc.

98 N.Y.2d 635 Court N.Y. Decision date 2002-04-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 635

Adam Z. Rice, Appellant, v Penguin Putnam, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted February 11, 2002;

decided April 30, 2002

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.