Versions of s. 336(1)

B-1.01 — Bank Act · 2 versions · View current text

Historical text comes from the Justice Laws point-in-time corpus and is unofficial — not the official version.

2012-12-19 to present available View Source

An application made or an action brought or intervened in under subsection 334(1) or section 338 need not be stayed or dismissed by reason only that it is shown that an alleged breach of a right or duty owed to the bank or its subsidiary has been or might be approved by the shareholders or members of the ~~bank~~bank, or ~~subsidiary~~by orthe ~~both,~~shareholders of the subsidiary, but evidence of approval by the shareholders or the members, as the case may be, may be taken into account by the court in making an order under section 335.

Full text

An application made or an action brought or intervened in under subsection 334(1) or section 338 need not be stayed or dismissed by reason only that it is shown that an alleged breach of a right or duty owed to the bank or its subsidiary has been or might be approved by the shareholders or members of the bank, or by the shareholders of the subsidiary, but evidence of approval by the shareholders or the members, as the case may be, may be taken into account by the court in making an order under section 335.
2003-01-01 to 2012-12-19 View Source

An application made or an action brought or intervened in under subsection 334(1) or section 338 need not be stayed or dismissed by reason only that it is shown that an alleged breach of a right or duty owed to the bank or its subsidiary has been or might be approved by the shareholders of the bank or subsidiary or both, but evidence of approval by the shareholders may be taken into account by the court in making an order under section 335.