Versions of s. 121(3)

Historical text comes from the Justice Laws point-in-time corpus and is unofficial — not the official version.

2004-12-15 to present available View Source

In any prosecution for an offence under this Part, it is sufficient proof of the offence to show that it was committed by an ~~employee~~employee, or an agent or a mandatary, of the accused, whether or not the ~~employee~~employee, or agent or mandatary, is identified or has been prosecuted for the offence, unless the accused establishes that the offence was committed without the knowledge or consent of the accused and that the accused exercised all due diligence to prevent its commission.

Full text

In any prosecution for an offence under this Part, it is sufficient proof of the offence to show that it was committed by an employee, or an agent or a mandatary, of the accused, whether or not the employee, or agent or mandatary, is identified or has been prosecuted for the offence, unless the accused establishes that the offence was committed without the knowledge or consent of the accused and that the accused exercised all due diligence to prevent its commission.
2002-12-31 to present View Source

In any prosecution for an offence under this Part, it is sufficient proof of the offence to show that it was committed by an employee or agent of the accused, whether or not the employee or agent is identified or has been prosecuted for the offence, unless the accused establishes that the offence was committed without the knowledge or consent of the accused and that the accused exercised all due diligence to prevent its commission.