← Cases

R. v. D.F.

2024 SCC 14 Court SCC Decision date 2024-04-22 Heard 2024-04-22 Docket 40941 English

PartiesHis Majesty The King Appellant·D.F. Respondent

Judges Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary

Decision 8–1 Majority (8) — Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O’Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. · Dissent (1) — Rowe J.

On appeal from Ontario

Contents
The Chief Justice — For the reasons of Hourigan J.A., dissenting at the Ontario Court of Appeal (2023 ONCA 584, 430 C.C.C. (3d) 171), a majority of this Court would allow the appeal. Justice Rowe, dissenting, would have dismissed the appeal, relying on paras. 50 and 52 of the reasons of Monahan J.A. relating to the legal error of failure by the trial judge to provide sufficient reasons. Therefore, the appeal is allowed, and the convictions for sexual interference and sexual assault are restored.

Cases cited