Majority
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Amabile v City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471 [1999]; Lichtman v Village of Kiryas Joel, 90 AD3d 1001 [2011]). The injured plaintiffs affidavit, submitted in opposition, presented feigned issues of fact designed to avoid the consequences of her earlier testimony, taken pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, and thus was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion (see Hunt v Meyers, 63 AD3d 685 , 685-686 [2009]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balkin, J.P., Hall, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Pena v. City of Yonkers 82 AD3d 728 p. 780
- Braver v. Village of Cedarhurst 94 AD3d 933 p. 780
- Amabile v. City of Buffalo 93 NY2d 471 p. 780
- Lichtman v. Village of Kiryas Joel 90 AD3d 1001 p. 780
- Hunt v. Meyers 63 AD3d 685 at 685-686 p. 780