Hébert v. The Queen

[1981] 1 SCR 361 Court SCC Decision date 1981-03-23 English

PartiesMaurice S. Hébert Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Counsel (4)

Michel Proulx, for the appellant.
Yves Berthiaume, for the respondent.
Solicitors for the appellant: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal.
Solicitor for the respondent: Y. Berthiaume, Montreal.

Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien

Decision 6–1 Majority (6) · MARTLAND J. (1)

On appeal from Quebec

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

Majority

English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

MARTLAND J.

MARTLAND J.—The detailed arguments submitted on behalf of the appellant have not persuaded us that the judgment of the Court of Appeal is ill-founded. The appeal is dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the appellant: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal.

Solicitor for the respondent: Y. Berthiaume, Montreal.

Footnotes

[1] [1979] C.A. 434.